EpicenteR: nuclear burn box titles

Community Forums/Showcase/EpicenteR: nuclear burn box titles

@rtur (Posted 2004) [#1]

Small voting... Here are two versions of box title: Which is best in your opinion? :-)

Rob Farley (Posted 2004) [#2]

Second one

Boiled Sweets (Posted 2004) [#3]

I like the only one! The red box in a white square :-)

Elf (Posted 2004) [#4]

First one for me. <edit> - I can see them both fine, by the way! </edit>

GfK (Posted 2004) [#5]

Not keen on either to be honest. But, gun to head, second one. I'd take off the "Powered by Blitz3D" thing. It means nothing to customers.

poopla (Posted 2004) [#6]

First myself.

Clique (Posted 2004) [#7]

the first one looks the best, looks more proffesional

Sweenie (Posted 2004) [#8]

First one...

pantsonhead.com (Posted 2004) [#9]

Quick first impressions: First one says "Radioactive Zombies" Second one says "Apocolypse Your Neighbour"

DarkNature (Posted 2004) [#10]

Second one definitely. Makes me want to buy a warhead right now. Have fun.

Ross C (Posted 2004) [#11]

First one

big10p (Posted 2004) [#12]

I'd have to go for the second if only because the image on the first is unrecognisable - I wouldn't know it's a nuclear explosion if it wasn't for the title. I'd keep the "powered by Blitz 3D" though. People will probably think "if it's worth putting on the box then it must be good". More interested customers might even go to the trouble of looking it up on the net and may even end up buying B3D. ;)

N (Posted 2004) [#13]

First one. It looks less cluttered and seems more fitting for the sub-title.

CodeD (Posted 2004) [#14]

somebody should help you with the text/grammar on the site the game looks nice but some of the wording on the site are hard to understand and come off a little unpro. just a suggestion not a flame.

Bot Builder (Posted 2004) [#15]

1st one looks like a commercial game to me :P You can still use the other one though - crop it down to "Epicenter Nuclear burn" and use it as a mini logo for loading screens etc. although you might already have that.....

Warren (Posted 2004) [#16]

First one.

mearrin69 (Posted 2004) [#17]

Yeah, first looks less like shareware ;) Looks pretty good actually. M

Kanati (Posted 2004) [#18]

2nd

@rtur (Posted 2004) [#19]

Thanks for feedback! :-)

* (Posted 2004) [#20]

first one (as its much more visual) the second one looks like a deformed tree.

Mustang (Posted 2004) [#21]

First one?

BlackJumper (Posted 2004) [#22]

First... second is too cliche - but then that might suit your purposes for gamers who like 'more of the same' !

BlitzSupport (Posted 2004) [#23]

First, easily.

Red Ocktober (Posted 2004) [#24]

the first one... and i love the lil blurb at the lower right... sorta gives the impression that the nuclear annialation will be powered by Bliz3D :) --Mike

TheMan (Posted 2004) [#25]

Firt one

Agamer (Posted 2004) [#26]

second one as if you walk in to a games shop (I know you might not be selling it in one) You look at the first one and it is like one colur an plain and boring and could sit on a elf The second one you may not of ever heard of but you'll picit up read the back then htey buy thats it

Caff (Posted 2004) [#27]

First one looks a bit cleaner because the title is more obvious. The second is graphically nice but the title is lost amongst the surroundings. but what is all that 'Wa00A00 Awentuin' thing at the bottom? That's just distracting.

JAW (Posted 2004) [#28]

Definately the first one. It looks much more professional. I'd make the "epicenter" text slightly less transparent though (almost black); it gets too lost in the background.

Rob (Posted 2004) [#29]

First one.