XOR ?
BlitzMax Forums/BlitzMax Programming/XOR ?
| ||
Hi Do you know if bmax have XOR operator ? Cheers |
| ||
No it hasn't *see Language - Expression* |
| ||
Hi :) I have find use : ~ example : Print 100 ~ 10 |
| ||
~ is not ... not xor a xor b = (a & ~b) | (~a & b) |
| ||
Depends how you use it (XOR is a bitwise NOT/compliment)b = 10 Print Bin$(b) b :~ 2 Print Bin$(b) b :~ 2 Print Bin$(b) Print Bin$(~b) |
| ||
hmm yeah you are right. Sorry for wrong posting above. Somehow missed the 2nd appearance of it in the help ... |
| ||
So :) what is XOR :) ? &~ ? :~ ? Can you clarify ? |
| ||
XOR is '~', eg: Print $face ~ $babe Bitwise invert is also '~', eg: Print ~0 This is similar to the dual use of the minus sign. |
| ||
Ok thanks mark :) for support ! :) |
| ||
interesting... mark, can you add new keywords for this??? i don't like such symbols - this is unreadable ~ -> XOR | -> BOR (bitwise OR) & -> BAND (bitwise AND) please please please... |
| ||
i agree ! |
| ||
I agree also. I like how we use Mod instead of %%%%@$#%^%^ An how we can do x:Int,z:String, instead of x%,z$!#%@$%# |
| ||
And it sure would save having to search the forum to find out why XOR doesn't work any more. |
| ||
mark, can you add new keywords for this??? Shouldn't it be BXOR tho? For consistence, XOR should be a conditional expression, ala. And Or and Not. |
| ||
Flameduck: x=~x or x=XOR x (if it available in some days..years) is the same like x=-x but x=y~z is harder to read than x=y XOR z theoreticaly here should exist XOR and BXOR... I don't understand why mark sibly do not add BAND, BOR and XOR-words... otherwise blitzmax looks so "unperfect" r=(argb SHR 16) & 255 looks not so good r=(argb SHR 16) BAND 255 is much better to read and understand i think this was a mistake to replace AND to & and add a logic AND instead of this. The most time i forget this and i write each time AND.. more infos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction |