Libxml compiling, again and again...
BlitzMax Forums/BlitzMax Beginners Area/Libxml compiling, again and again...
| ||
| So, I finally installed MinGW and compiled Brucey's libxml (yay!) but now whenever I try and run one of the examples Project Studio compiles it again. And, it keeps on doing it every time I try and run one of the examples. Is this normal, or have I missed something? I'm guessing I've missed something... |
| ||
| is quick build enabled? |
| ||
| Good question. Is that Release or Debug, or another option? EDIT: Ah, okay I see. I can't find the option under Project Studio though... it only seems to exist for Maxide... 2nd EDIT: I just tried Blide. I seem to have an xml error, but not the compiling issue... |
| ||
| Since libxml is a module it shouldn't be recompiled even without quick build, should it? |
| ||
| @Otus, I think he means the examples are being re-compiled each time, which indeed makes it appear that Quick Build is not enabled. |
| ||
| Oh, if that's the case it indeed seems like a quick build issue. Off the topic, I think there should be an auto-quick mode, where quick build is tried first and if it fails, everything is recompiled. That would sort so many issues. |
| ||
| That's correct, Brucey. Right now under Project Studio Ide I have the re-compiling issue, and under Blide I have the error, (both with and without Quick Build) "Unhandled Exception:Attempt to access field or method of Null object" That's for 'example1'. The console says... ********************************************** Building executable... Debugger started. aaa.xml:3: parser error : XML declaration allowed only at the start of the document <?xml version="1.0"?> ^ closing debug... Debugger ended. |
| ||
| I think I should probably throw that particular example away. It's not very good - especially after the first time you've run it. There are lots of examples included with the docs though. Build the documentation and have a look at BaH.libxml in the 3rd Party Modules section. |
| ||
| I can do that, sure... but is the example (as bad as you mention it is) supposed to cause those issues? |
| ||
| It's actually reporting the correct error. The xml it is parsing is incorrect. |
| ||
| Ah, okay... thanks Brucey :) I'm a complete beginner, so I have a steep climb ahead of me to understand everything. Anyhow, thanks for your work on all of the modules. |
   |