[Linux]-[BMAX 1.30 rev 1.61]-libc.so.6 issue

Archives Forums/BlitzMax Bug Reports/[Linux]-[BMAX 1.30 rev 1.61]-libc.so.6 issue

flaith(Posted 2008) [#1]
Hi,

after updated to rev 1.61, i received :

U /home/flaith/1-Programs/BlitzMax1.30/mod/brl.mod/blitz.mod/blitz_app.c
U /home/flaith/1-Programs/BlitzMax1.30/src/bmk/bmk_util.bmx
Actualisé à la révision 161.

U /home/flaith/1-Programs/BlitzMax1.30/bin/makedocs
U /home/flaith/1-Programs/BlitzMax1.30/bin/docmods
U /home/flaith/1-Programs/BlitzMax1.30/bin/bmk
Actualisé à la révision 161.



but after a bmk makemods :
./bin/bmk: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./bin/bmk)


I'm under Debian Etch with libc6-i386 version 2.3.6.ds1-13etch7

Thanks for your help


skidracer(Posted 2008) [#2]
not an uncommon problem for linux binary distributors, this guy has found a possible solution which we may be able to use, although there is an not 4 ubuntu link at the bottom which makes pretty sad reading:

http://gbgames.com/blog/2008/04/linux-game-development-glibc_24-errors-solved/


flaith(Posted 2008) [#3]
Thanks for the link skidracer, going to read it ... and pray to fine a solution to my problem


flaith(Posted 2008) [#4]
Am i the only one to have this issue ?
I still cannot compile any program :(


#Reaper(Posted 2008) [#5]
Hi,
I also have had (my english is bad...btw) this problem. I dont solved it. I just went back to revision 151, then it works again. Maybe the new reivison 164 is working fine, but I havent it tested jet.

#Reaper


flaith(Posted 2008) [#6]
Hi #Reaper, i've just updated to rev 164 (thread), no change.
How did you downgrade to previous revision ?


#Reaper(Posted 2008) [#7]
Hi,
in command-line:
svn update -r 151
(then only it downgraded the lib-folder, I dont know why only this) or
svn update -r 151 bin
for the bin-folder only.
I hope it works :)

greetings
#Reaper


flaith(Posted 2008) [#8]
thanks for the info

After downgrading to revision 151, a bmk makemods has given a
Command line error
:(

But now i can compile my programs

thanks #Reaper :)

** EDIT ***********
Same pb with rev 166
******************


#Reaper(Posted 2008) [#9]
no problem :)

I was able to compile the mods with rev 151.
Are you sure that you used it correct? (I forget every time how to use... ;) )
The docu says:

The makemods operation builds a set of modules.

Makemods takes one optional argument: a module filter. This can be a module scope name (to build a subset of modules) or a fully qualified module name (to build an individual module). If the module filter is omitted, than all module are built.

Valid options for makemods are: Option Effect
-d Build debug version. By default, both debug and release versions are built.
-r Build release version. By default, both debug and release versions are built.
-a Build all modules regardless of timestamps. By default, only modules that have been modified are built.

Some examples of makemods in action:
bmk makemods mymods
bmk makemods -a mymods.testmod



So you could try
bmk makemods -a
to rebuild all mods. I hope that works. :)
But maybe (I dont know) you dont need to rebuild all mods if you downgraded..?


greetings
#Reaper
:-)


flaith(Posted 2008) [#10]
bmk makemods -a


perfect, it's ok, for now ;)

Thanks again #Reaper :D